Case Summaries
Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. United States
Introduction Wisconsin Central Ltd v. United States involved an appeal filed by several railroads on the issue of whether stock options were a form of
Texas Federal Judge Throws Out Sex and Gender Discrimination Claim Against Well Fargo.
Case Name: Ryan v. Wells Fargo Bank NA Court: United States District Court – Northern District of Texas Date of Opinion: January 22nd, 2022 Judge:
Federal Court Judge Denies Motion for Summary Judgment in Instagram Embedding Copyright Infringement Claim
Case Name: McGucken v. Newsweek LLC et al Court: United States District Court – Southern District of New York Date of Opinion: March 21, 2022
Vartelas v. Holder
Introduction In Vartelas v. Holder, the Supreme Court held that an immigration law enacted by Congress to exclude entry by aliens convicted of a crime
U.S. District Court Throws Out ADA Claim Against Government Contractor
Case Name: Salmoiraghi v. Veritiss, LLC Court: United States District Court – Eastern District of Virginia Date of Opinion: April 6th, 2022 Judge: Michael S.
Summary Judgment Granted in Discrimination Lawsuit Against CBS Corporation
Case Name: Dedewo v. CBS Corporation Court: United States District Court – Southern District of New York Date of Opinion: April 4th, 2022 Judge: Alvin
Hospital Granted Summary Judgment in Case Involving Doctor of Osteopathy’s Discrimination Claim
Case Name: Koppar v. Orange Regional Medical Center et al Court: United States District Court – Southern District of New York Date of Opinion: February
Turner v. Safely
482 U.S. 78, 107 S. Ct. 2254, 96 L. Ed. 2d 64 (1987) Introduction In Turner v. Safely, the Supreme Court decided a challenge to
Organic Farmacy Management, LLC. v. Four Green Fields, LLC
(Md. Ct. Spec. App., July 27, 2021, No. 0760, 2021 WL 3173263) Not Reported in Atl. Rptr. Overview A contract dispute arose between business partners
Barbuto v. Advantage Sales and Marketing
477 Mass. 456 (2017) 78 N.E.3d 37, 33 A.D. Cases 967 Summary Under Massachusetts law, an accommodation for an employee’s medical marijuana use is not
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in AnyLaw Case Summaries and Law Thoughts are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of this website.
Articles do not constitute legal advice.
© Lexsphere LTD. Reproduction of the material contained in this publication may be made only with the written permission of Lexsphere LTD.