Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This Document Cites the Following Cases:
Ellis v. Maine
448 F.2d 1325 (1971) | Cited 38 times
This case is cited by:
Citation is not available at this time. Please check back later.
Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This case cites:
This case is cited by:

United States v. Sean Brown

2011 | Cited 0 times | D. New Hampshire | December 14, 2011

ORDER

Re: Document No. 96, MOTION for Leave to File a Pro Se Pleading

Ruling: Denied. This case is closed; final judgment has been entered. The period in which defendant could have filed a petition for relief under the federal habeas provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255 has expired. Finally, defendant has not made (and likely cannot make) the requisite showing of need for, nor entitlement to, transcripts at government expense. See Ellis v. State of Maine, 448 F.2d 1325, 1327 (1st Cir. 1971); 28 U.S.C. § 753(f).

Steven J. McAuliffe

cc:

Back to top