United States v. Sanchez

2010 | Cited 0 times | D. Massachusetts | April 15, 2010


Defendant Alexander Sanchez has moved that the Court submit two special questions to the jury: one asking whether the defendant conspired to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine, and one asking the same question as to 5 kilograms or more of cocaine.

The indictment alleges a conspiracy involving 500 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B)(ii). Defendant is subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of five years if the government proves the charge of 500 grams or more. If it proves 5 kilograms or more, defendant is subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of ten years.

The government agrees that it must prove a drug quantity of 500 grams beyond a reasonable doubt. The question is whether the higher drug weight issue-that is, whether the defendant is responsible for 5 kilograms or more of cocaine-is an issue for the jury (as an element of the offense) or for the Court at sentencing (as a sentence factor). The answer to that question has been supplied by the Supreme Court and the First Circuit.

A fact that increases a statutory minimum sentence may be found by the sentencing judge by a preponderance of the evidence. Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 568-69 (2002); McMillan v. Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79 (1986). Thus, "drug quantity for purposes of § 841 is a sentencing factor that may be determined by a preponderance of the evidence." United States v. Goodine, 326 F.3d 26, 32 (1st Cir. 2003); see United States v. Malouf, 466 F.3d 21, 26-27 (1st Cir. 2006).

In light of that case law, it appears clear that a special jury question as to drug weight is not appropriate. Accordingly, defendant's motion for special jury questions is DENIED.

So Ordered.

F. Dennis Saylor IV United States District Judge

Back to top