Squirewell Builders

No. 2006-UP-120

2006 | Cited 0 times | Court of Appeals of South Carolina | February 24, 2006

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

Unpublished Opinion

Heard February 8, 2006

AFFIRMED

In this mechanic's lien case a jury awarded Squirewell Builders $56,500, plus attorney's fees and prejudgment interest in payment for work performed in constructing the Frederick's home. The Fredericks appeal on several grounds. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: Ellie, Inc. v. Miccichi, 358 S.C. 78, 102, 594 S.E.2d 485, 498 (Ct. App. 2004) ("It is well-settled that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Addison, 338 S.C. 277, 284-85, 525 S.E.2d 901, 905 (Ct. App. 1999) (explaining that an issue is not preserved when the grounds raised on appeal are different than those raised below); Evans v. Wabash Life Ins. Co., 247 S.C. 464, 466, 148 S.E.2d 153 (1966) (holding that the failure to make a directed verdict motion at the close of all evidence precludes a review of the motion's denial on appeal).

AFFIRMED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

Unpublished Opinion

Heard February 8, 2006

AFFIRMED

In this mechanic's lien case a jury awarded Squirewell Builders $56,500, plus attorney's fees and prejudgment interest in payment for work performed in constructing the Frederick's home. The Fredericks appeal on several grounds. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following authorities: Ellie, Inc. v. Miccichi, 358 S.C. 78, 102, 594 S.E.2d 485, 498 (Ct. App. 2004) ("It is well-settled that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review."); State v. Addison, 338 S.C. 277, 284-85, 525 S.E.2d 901, 905 (Ct. App. 1999) (explaining that an issue is not preserved when the grounds raised on appeal are different than those raised below); Evans v. Wabash Life Ins. Co., 247 S.C. 464, 466, 148 S.E.2d 153 (1966) (holding that the failure to make a directed verdict motion at the close of all evidence precludes a review of the motion's denial on appeal).

AFFIRMED.

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.

Case Summary:
To generate a summary for Squirewell Builders click here.
Back to top