Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This Document Cites the Following Cases:
Citation is not available at this time. Please check back later.
This case is cited by:
UNITED STATES v. READ
360 F. Supp. 1033 (1973) | Cited 0 times
Dornan v. United States
460 F.2d 425 (1972) | Cited 6 times
CHEN WANG v. HORIO
741 F. Supp. 1373 (1989) | Cited 1 time
United States v. Peskin
527 F.2d 71 (1975) | Cited 70 times
HALLETT v. UNITED STATES
877 F. Supp. 1423 (1995) | Cited 0 times
United States v. Prudden
424 F.2d 1021 (1970) | Cited 77 times
Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This case cites:
This case is cited by:

RUFFALO v. MAHONING COUNTY BAR ASSN.

90 S. Ct. 555 (1970) | Cited 6 times | Supreme Court | January 12, 1970

Motion to use record and appendix in No.73, October Term, 1967 [In re Ruffalo, 390 U.S. 544], granted. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. MR. JUSTICE STEWART took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.

Back to top