Moore v. Youth Promise

2003 | Cited 0 times | D. Maine | October 3, 2003

ORDER

The defendant Mary Trescott's motion to dismiss is GRANTED . On the federal claim, the plaintiff concedes that his claim is foreclosed in light of Gough v. Eastern Maine Development Corp., 172 F. Supp. 2d 221 (D. Me. 2001). On the state law claim, Maine's Law Court has withdrawn its decision in Gordon v. Cummings, 2000 WL 419716 (Me. April 19, 2000), withdrawn, 756 A.2d 942 (Me. 2000). I therefore conclude that Gough's conclusion that the federal treatment should also govern the state claim remains pertinent. See Miller v. Hall, 245 F. Supp. 2d 191 (Me. 2003).

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2003.

Back to top