Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This Document Cites the Following Cases:
Citation is not available at this time. Please check back later.
This case is cited by:
NEAL KLEIN v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES
360 N.Y.S.2d 60 (1974) | Cited 3 times
GOTZ v. DELTA AIR LINES
12 F. Supp. 2d 199 (1998) | Cited 0 times
Evangelinos v. Trans World Airlines
550 F.2d 152 (1977) | Cited 34 times
EVANGELINOS v. TWA
396 F. Supp. 95 (1975) | Cited 0 times
HUSSERL v. SWISS AIR TRANSP. CO.
351 F. Supp. 702 (1972) | Cited 0 times
IN RE TEL AVIV
405 F. Supp. 154 (1975) | Cited 0 times
BEAUDET v. BRITISH AIRWAYS
853 F. Supp. 1062 (1994) | Cited 0 times
Herrmann v. ExpressJet Airlines
2009 | Cited 0 times
RABINOWITZ v. SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES
741 F. Supp. 441 (1990) | Cited 0 times
Tseng v. El Al Israel Airlines
122 F.3d 99 (1997) | Cited 17 times
Day v. Trans World Airlines Inc.
528 F.2d 31 (1975) | Cited 82 times
AIR FRANCE v. SAKS
105 S. Ct. 1338 (1985) | Cited 261 times
Hernandez v. Air France
545 F.2d 279 (1976) | Cited 22 times
Ugaz v. American Airlines
576 F.Supp.2d 1354 (2008) | Cited 3 times
Fedelich v. American Airlines
2010 | Cited 0 times
KANTONIDES v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES
802 F. Supp. 1203 (1992) | Cited 0 times
MCCARTHY v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES
862 F. Supp. 17 (1994) | Cited 0 times
Hepp v. United Airlines Inc.
540 P.2d 1141 (1975) | Cited 0 times
WARSHAW v. TWA
442 F. Supp. 400 (1977) | Cited 0 times
Abramson v. Japan Airlines Co.
739 F.2d 130 (1984) | Cited 42 times
DAY v. TWA
393 F. Supp. 217 (1975) | Cited 0 times
KRYSTAL v. BRITISH OVERSEAS AIRWAYS CORP.
403 F. Supp. 1322 (1975) | Cited 0 times
Demarines v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
580 F.2d 1193 (1978) | Cited 82 times
07/09/92 DAWN J. STOVALL v. NORTHWEST AIRLINES
595 N.E.2d 330 (1992) | Cited 0 times
KABBANI v. INTERNATIONAL TOTAL SERVS.
805 F. Supp. 1033 (1992) | Cited 0 times
BRUNWASSER v. TWA
541 F. Supp. 1338 (1982) | Cited 0 times
ALLEYN v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK
58 F. Supp.2d 15 (1999) | Cited 0 times
DEMARINES v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES
433 F. Supp. 1047 (1977) | Cited 0 times
Rex v. Cia. Pervana De Vapores
660 F.2d 61 (1981) | Cited 25 times
Krys v. Lufthansa German Airlines
119 F.3d 1515 (1997) | Cited 46 times
Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This case cites:
This case is cited by:

MacDonald v. Air Canada

439 F.2d 1402 (1971) | Cited 31 times | First Circuit | March 25, 1971

ALDRICH, Chief Judge:

* Neither does the imposition of liability without fault, as was effected, with respect to United States connected carriage, by the Montreal Agreement. The Agreement, as such, could not change the meaning of Article 17 of the Convention, but we believe its framers assumed the same restricted meaning of that article that we do.

Back to top