Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This Document Cites the Following Cases:
Citation is not available at this time. Please check back later.
This case is cited by:
KLINE v. UNITED STATES
41 F. Supp. 577 (1941) | Cited 0 times
JOHNSTON SEED CO. v. UNITED STATES
90 F. Supp. 358 (1950) | Cited 0 times
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASS'NS
101 F. Supp. 710 (1951) | Cited 0 times
T. I. MCCORMACK TRUCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES
251 F. Supp. 526 (1966) | Cited 0 times
TRANSAMERICAN FREIGHT LINES v. UNITED STATES
51 F. Supp. 405 (1943) | Cited 0 times
COLONIAL REFRIGERATED TRANSP.
255 F. Supp. 999 (1966) | Cited 0 times
REFRIGERATED TRANSP. CO. v. UNITED STATES
214 F. Supp. 536 (1963) | Cited 0 times
07/14/65 Holiday Tours
1965.CDC.0000164 (1965) | Cited 0 times
WATSON BROS. TRANSP. CO. v. UNITED STATES
59 F. Supp. 762 (1945) | Cited 0 times
DENVER CHICAGO TRANSP. CO. v. UNITED STATES
183 F. Supp. 785 (1960) | Cited 0 times
J. B. ACTON
221 F. Supp. 174 (1963) | Cited 0 times
ALABAMA HWY. EXPRESS
241 F. Supp. 290 (1965) | Cited 0 times
GARFORD TRUCKING
64 F. Supp. 780 (1946) | Cited 0 times
MOORE v. UNITED STATES
41 F. Supp. 786 (1941) | Cited 0 times
JARMAN v. UNITED STATES
219 F. Supp. 108 (1963) | Cited 0 times
CARDINALE TRUCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES
232 F. Supp. 339 (1964) | Cited 0 times
Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This case cites:
This case is cited by:

LOVING ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.

60 S. Ct. 898 (1940) | Cited 16 times | Supreme Court | April 29, 1940

Per Curiam: The judgment is affirmed. McDonald v. Thompson, 305 U.S. 263, 266; United States v. Maher, 307 U.S. 148, 153-154; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Union Pacific R. Co., 222 U.S. 541, 547-548; Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U.S. 294, 311-312.

Back to top