Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This Document Cites the Following Cases:
Citation is not available at this time. Please check back later.
This case is cited by:
MCNEIL v. A/S HAVTOR
326 F. Supp. 226 (1971) | Cited 0 times
Pioneer Steamship Co. v. Hill
227 F.2d 262 (1955) | Cited 2 times
MERRILL v. THE S.S. CUACO
189 F. Supp. 321 (1960) | Cited 0 times
01/25/84 Office of the Federal v. Office of the Federal
1984.CDC.0000025 (1984) | Cited 0 times
MCMAHAN v. THE PANAMOLGA
127 F. Supp. 659 (1955) | Cited 0 times
TARABOCCHIA v. ZIM ISRAEL NAVIGATION CO.
297 F. Supp. 378 (1969) | Cited 0 times
10/24/56 WILLIAM BERRYHILL v. PACIFIC FAR EAST LINE
238 F.2d 385 (1956) | Cited 0 times
Morales v. City of Galveston
275 F.2d 191 (1960) | Cited 8 times
Bill Law v. Victory Carriers Inc.
432 F.2d 376 (1970) | Cited 15 times
Ezekiel v. Volusia Steamship Co.
297 F.2d 215 (1961) | Cited 14 times
ANTOINE v. LAKE CHARLES STEVEDORES
249 F. Supp. 290 (1965) | Cited 0 times
Mosley v. Cia. Mar. Adra
314 F.2d 223 (1963) | Cited 29 times
DELAWARE
189 F. Supp. 39 (1960) | Cited 0 times
ARMORED CARRIER CORP. v. UNITED STATES
260 F. Supp. 612 (1966) | Cited 0 times
TRANS-AMERICAN VAN SERV. v. UNITED STATES
421 F. Supp. 308 (1976) | Cited 0 times
FREEMAN v. GREENVILLE TOWING CO.
201 F. Supp. 770 (1962) | Cited 0 times
WYBORSKI EX REL. LIBERTY MUT. INS. CO. v. BRISTOL
191 F. Supp. 884 (1961) | Cited 0 times
DEFFES v. FEDERAL BARGE LINES
229 F. Supp. 719 (1964) | Cited 0 times
Alamo Express Inc. v. United States
673 F.2d 852 (1982) | Cited 20 times
Green v. City of Los Angeles
40 Cal. App. 3d 819 (1974) | Cited 0 times
06/02/65 PACIFIC FAR EAST LINE v. JONES STEVEDORING
346 F.2d 642 (1965) | Cited 0 times
12/10/84 Egbert L. Wright v. Ocean Drilling and
461 So. 2d 1084 (1984) | Cited 0 times
SHERBIN v. S. G. EMBIRICOS
200 F. Supp. 874 (1962) | Cited 0 times
LITWINOWICZ v. WEYERHAEUSER S.S. CO.
179 F. Supp. 812 (1959) | Cited 0 times
10/22/64 EDDIE HUFF v. MATSON NAVIGATION COMPANY
338 F.2d 205 (1964) | Cited 0 times
Grzybowski v. Arrow Barge Co.
283 F.2d 481 (1960) | Cited 11 times
RAPISARDI v. UNITED FRUIT CO.
300 F. Supp. 942 (1969) | Cited 0 times
Farrell Lines
127 A.2d 640 (1956) | Cited 13 times
C-LINE
376 F. Supp. 1043 (1974) | Cited 0 times
ST. JOHNSBURY TRUCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES
326 F. Supp. 938 (1971) | Cited 0 times
COLUMBIA TRANSP. CO. v. UNITED STATES
167 F. Supp. 5 (1958) | Cited 0 times
Chagois v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.
432 F.2d 388 (1970) | Cited 16 times
Walker v. Gilligan
487 F.2d 508 (1973) | Cited 0 times
Hagans v. Ellerman & Bucknall Steamship Co.
318 F.2d 563 (1963) | Cited 35 times
Drachenberg v. Canal Barge Co.
571 F.2d 912 (1978) | Cited 25 times
HILL v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES
194 F. Supp. 885 (1961) | Cited 0 times
In re Charley''s Tour and Transportation Inc.
522 P.2d 1272 (1974) | Cited 0 times
ROPER v. UNITED STATES
170 F. Supp. 763 (1959) | Cited 0 times
SOLET v. M/V CAPT. H. V. DUFRENE
303 F. Supp. 980 (1969) | Cited 0 times
09/09/59 CARL E. THORSON v. INLAND NAVIGATION
270 F.2d 432 (1959) | Cited 0 times
LEON A. THOMPSON v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY
227 N.Y.S.2d 80 (1962) | Cited 0 times
SCHAFFER v. UNITED STATES
139 F. Supp. 444 (1956) | Cited 0 times
BALTIMORE & OHIO R.R. CO. v. UNITED STATES
151 F. Supp. 258 (1957) | Cited 0 times
Roper v. United States
282 F.2d 413 (1960) | Cited 9 times
Carabellese v. Naviera Aznar
285 F.2d 355 (1960) | Cited 12 times
Kent v. Shell Oil Co.
286 F.2d 746 (1961) | Cited 18 times
REED v. THE S.S. YAKA
183 F. Supp. 69 (1960) | Cited 0 times
Spann v. Lauritzen.
344 F.2d 204 (1965) | Cited 29 times
Shenker v. United States
322 F.2d 622 (1963) | Cited 31 times
Norfleet v. Isthmian Lines Inc.
355 F.2d 359 (1966) | Cited 21 times
CONSIDINE v. BLACK DIAMOND S.S. CORP.
163 F. Supp. 107 (1958) | Cited 0 times
Reid v. Quebec Paper Sales & Transportation Co.
340 F.2d 34 (1965) | Cited 19 times
REYNOLDS v. ROYAL MAIL LINES
147 F. Supp. 223 (1956) | Cited 0 times
ROADWAY EXPRESS
213 F. Supp. 868 (1963) | Cited 0 times
Vega v. Malula
291 F.2d 415 (1961) | Cited 50 times
Osceola v. Florida Department of Revenue
893 F.2d 1231 (1990) | Cited 18 times
MCKNIGHT v. N. M. PATERSON & SONS
181 F. Supp. 434 (1960) | Cited 0 times
HENRY v. S.S. MT. EVANS
227 F. Supp. 408 (1964) | Cited 0 times
Williams v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.
313 F.2d 203 (1963) | Cited 34 times
Deffes v. Federal Barge Lines Inc.
361 F.2d 422 (1966) | Cited 18 times
Forkin v. Withy
323 F.2d 638 (1963) | Cited 12 times
Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This case cites:
This case is cited by:

GEO. F. ALGER CO. ET AL. v. PECK

74 S. Ct. 853 (1954) | Cited 66 times | Supreme Court | June 1, 1954

Per Curiam: The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.

Back to top