Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This Document Cites the Following Cases:
Citation is not available at this time. Please check back later.
This case is cited by:
ROMAN v. U.S.
741 F. Supp. 43 (1990) | Cited 0 times
Higley v. Michigan Department of Corrections
835 F.2d 623 (1987) | Cited 6 times
IN RE CATFISH ANTITRUST LITIG.
826 F. Supp. 1019 (1993) | Cited 0 times
Cooper v. City of Greenwood
904 F.2d 302 (1990) | Cited 34 times
VITAYA ISARAPHANICH v. UNITED STATES
632 F. Supp. 1531 (1986) | Cited 0 times
COLORADO EX REL. COLORADO AG v. WESTERN PAVING CON
630 F. Supp. 206 (1986) | Cited 0 times
Colorado v. Western Paving Construction Co.
833 F.2d 867 (1987) | Cited 6 times
LAGON v. BARRY
658 F. Supp. 55 (1987) | Cited 0 times
Chauffeurs v. C.R.S.T. Inc.
795 F.2d 1400 (1986) | Cited 24 times
Cutbirth v. State
751 P.2d 1257 (1988) | Cited 2 times
Charlima Inc. v. United States
873 F.2d 1078 (1989) | Cited 15 times
Renzi v. Warden
792 F.2d 311 (1986) | Cited 2 times
Ames v. New York State Division of Parole
772 F.2d 13 (1985) | Cited 12 times
VIRELLA v. U.S.
750 F. Supp. 111 (1990) | Cited 0 times
PATTERSON v. SCULLY
621 F. Supp. 524 (1985) | Cited 0 times
MINOR v. HENDERSON
754 F. Supp. 1010 (1991) | Cited 0 times
DYMM v. CAHILL
730 F. Supp. 1245 (1990) | Cited 0 times
ORTHO DIAGNOSTIC SYS. v. ABBOTT LABS.
926 F. Supp. 371 (1996) | Cited 0 times
HODAS v. SHERBURNE
938 F. Supp. 60 (1996) | Cited 1 time
Allbee v. Maass
1992 | Cited 0 times
COGBURN v. UNITED STATES
717 F. Supp. 958 (1989) | Cited 0 times
Nolan v. Prime Tanning Co.
871 F.2d 76 (1989) | Cited 14 times
Rodriguez v. Banco Central
917 F.2d 664 (1990) | Cited 47 times
Texas v. Allan Construction Co.
851 F.2d 1526 (1988) | Cited 51 times
Rodriguez v. Schully
788 F.2d 62 (1986) | Cited 4 times
IN RE ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE ANTITRUST LITIG.
905 F. Supp. 1457 (1995) | Cited 0 times
DONAHUE v. PENDLETON WOLLEN MILLS
633 F. Supp. 1423 (1986) | Cited 0 times
UNITED STATES v. SEWARDS
879 F. Supp. 502 (1995) | Cited 0 times
Grooms v. Keeney
826 F.2d 883 (1987) | Cited 33 times
Keck v. State of Nevada
2020 | Cited 0 times
IN RE ATLANTIC FIN. MGMT.
718 F. Supp. 1003 (1988) | Cited 1 time
MORALES v. DIGITAL EQUIP. CORP.
669 F. Supp. 1173 (1987) | Cited 0 times
VARGAS v. JAGO
636 F. Supp. 425 (1986) | Cited 0 times
06/26/89 STATE TENNESSEE v. DEBBIE SUE MOORE
774 S.W.2d 590 (1989) | Cited 2 times
Panuccio v. Kelly
927 F.2d 106 (1991) | Cited 59 times
Davis v. Grusemeyer
996 F.2d 617 (1993) | Cited 108 times
Here’s how to get more nuanced and relevant search results:
FOR THESE RESULTS... USE THE SYNTAX... FOR EXAMPLE...
Both terms must be present and trademark and infringement
Either term must be present or trademark or infringement
Exclude a term not trademark not infringement
Enclosed quotation (exact match) "  " "trademark infringement"
Unidirectional search, left to right: in armed robbery w/5 gun, "gun" occurs to right of "armed robbery." w/# armed robbery w/5 gun
Bidirectional search: in armed robbery near:5 gun, "gun" occurs to either to right or left of "armed robbery." near:x armed robbery near:5 gun
Grouping search terms ( ) (bike or scooter) w/3 (injury or accident)
Expand root word by any number of letters ! liab! yields liable or liability
This case cites:
This case is cited by:

BOUTA v. AMERICAN FEDERATION STATE

105 S. Ct. 1764 (1985) | Cited 40 times | Supreme Court | March 18, 1985

Certiorari denied.

* JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of the orders announced on this date.

Back to top