Andrew Flood v. Patricia Barnhart

2011 | Cited 0 times | D. Maine | July 5, 2011

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 31, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition and Memorandum Decision on Motion to Reconsider Regarding Bail and Appointment of Counsel. The petitioner filed objections to both on June 30, 2011.

I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary. The petition for § 2254 relief is DENIED.

I have reviewed and considered the Memorandum Decision. I concur with the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Decision because it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The motion to appoint counsel and reconsider the denial of bail is DENIED.

The petitioner's motion for hearing and production of documents is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

D. BROCK HORNBY

Back to top